{"id":656,"date":"2026-04-14T05:15:46","date_gmt":"2026-04-13T23:45:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.xtd-ss.com\/blog\/?p=656"},"modified":"2026-05-30T12:53:02","modified_gmt":"2026-05-30T07:23:02","slug":"304-vs-316-stainless-steel","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.xtd-ss.com\/blog\/304-vs-316-stainless-steel\/","title":{"rendered":"304 vs 316 Stainless Steel: Which One Is Better?"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"bsf_rt_marker\"><\/div>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Both 304 and 316 are austenitic stainless steels that resist corrosion, handle high temperatures, and weld easily. One critical element that separates them is molybdenum. This element improves corrosion resistance and affects both performance and cost.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This comparison covers chemical composition, corrosion resistance, mechanical properties, cost, and the best applications for 304 and 316 stainless steel pipes. By the end, one will know exactly which grade fits your project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">What Is 304 Stainless Steel?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.xtd-ss.com\/stainless-steel-304.html\">304 stainless steel<\/a> includes approximately 18% chromium and 8% nickel. It is the most common stainless steel grade in production today, making up roughly 50% of all stainless steel output globally.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">304 is known as 18\/8 stainless steel in the industry. Its UNS designation is S30400, and its low-carbon variant, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.xtd-ss.com\/stainless-steel-304l.html\">304L (S30403)<\/a>, limits carbon to 0.03% maximum for better weldability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">304 handles atmospheric corrosion, mild chemicals, and food-contact applications very well. It falls short when chlorides enter the picture.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">What Is 316 Stainless Steel?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.xtd-ss.com\/stainless-steel-316.html\">316 stainless steel<\/a> contains approximately <strong>16% chromium, 10% nickel, and 2\u20133% molybdenum<\/strong>. This molybdenum addition is the key difference. The UNS designation is <strong>S31600<\/strong>, and its low-carbon version is <a href=\"https:\/\/www.xtd-ss.com\/stainless-steel-316l.html\">316L (S31603)<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The 2\u20133% molybdenum gives 316 <strong>significantly better resistance to chloride pitting and crevice corrosion<\/strong>. That makes it the go-to grade for marine, chemical, and pharmaceutical applications.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Chemical Composition: 304 vs 316<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This table compares the chemical composition of 304 and 316 stainless steel per <a href=\"https:\/\/www.xtd-ss.com\/astm-a312-pipes.html\">ASTM A312<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table is-style-stripes\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><tbody><tr><td><strong>Element<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>304 (S30400)<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>316 (S31600)<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Chromium (Cr)<\/td><td>18.0\u201320.0%<\/td><td>16.0\u201318.0%<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Nickel (Ni)<\/td><td>8.0\u201310.5%<\/td><td>10.0\u201314.0%<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Molybdenum (Mo)<\/td><td>None<\/td><td>2.0\u20133.0%<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Carbon (C)<\/td><td>0.08% max<\/td><td>0.08% max<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Manganese (Mn)<\/td><td>2.0% max<\/td><td>2.0% max<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Silicon (Si)<\/td><td>0.75% max<\/td><td>0.75% max<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Nitrogen (N)<\/td><td>0.10% max<\/td><td>0.10% max<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The key difference: 316 trades some chromium for <strong>higher nickel and adds molybdenum<\/strong>. This shifts its corrosion resistance profile toward chloride-heavy environments.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Corrosion Resistance: Where Each Grade Wins<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Pitting Resistance (PREN)<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Pitting Resistance Equivalent Number (PREN) measures a grade\u2019s ability to resist chloride pitting. Higher PREN = better pitting resistance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>PREN formula<\/strong>: PREN is calculated as %Cr + 3.3\u00d7%Mo + 16\u00d7%N (ISO 11463 variant).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>304 PREN<\/strong>: ~18<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>316 PREN<\/strong>: ~23\u201325<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">That 5\u20137 point difference is significant. It means 316 resists pitting in <strong>chloride concentrations up to 1,000 ppm<\/strong>, while 304 resists pitting under typical ambient conditions; actual thresholds vary with temperature, pH, and surface finish.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Atmospheric Corrosion<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">304 performs well in indoor and outdoor atmospheric conditions. It handles rain, humidity, and mild pollution without issues. For architectural and food-grade applications, 304 is sufficient.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Chemical Corrosion<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">316 outperforms 304 in:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Sulfuric acid<\/strong> at low concentrations<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Hydrochloric acid<\/strong> traces<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Acetic acid and formic acid<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Seawater and brackish water<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Use 304 for mild conditions. Switch to 316 when chlorides, acids, or marine exposure are part of the equation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Mechanical Properties: 304 vs 316<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This table compares the mechanical properties of 304 and 316 stainless steel at room temperature.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table is-style-stripes\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><tbody><tr><td><strong>Property<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>304<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>316<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Tensile Strength<\/td><td>515 MPa (75 ksi) min<\/td><td>515 MPa (75 ksi) min<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Yield Strength<\/td><td>205 MPa (30 ksi) min<\/td><td>205 MPa (30 ksi) min<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Elongation<\/td><td>40% min<\/td><td>40% min<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Hardness (Brinell)<\/td><td>201 HB max<\/td><td>217 HB max<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Density<\/td><td>7.93 g\/cm\u00b3<\/td><td>7.98 g\/cm\u00b3<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The mechanical properties are <strong>nearly identical<\/strong>. You will not gain a strength advantage by choosing one over the other. The choice comes down to corrosion resistance and cost.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Temperature Performance<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Both grades handle <strong>continuous service up to 870\u00b0C (1,598\u00b0F)<\/strong> and intermittent service up to 925\u00b0C (1,697\u00b0F).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For temperatures above 425\u00b0C (797\u00b0F) in long-term service, consider carbide-stabilised grades such as 321 (titanium-stabilised) or 347 (niobium-stabilised). Both 304 and 316 can suffer from sensitisation (chromium carbide precipitation) in the <strong>425\u2013870\u00b0C range<\/strong> during extended exposure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The low-carbon versions (304L and 316L) reduce sensitisation risk but do not eliminate it at the highest temperatures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Cost Comparison: 304 vs 316<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\"><img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"2560\" height=\"2560\" src=\"https:\/\/www.xtd-ss.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/cost-comparison-scaled.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1229\" style=\"object-fit:cover;width:443px;height:auto\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.xtd-ss.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/cost-comparison-scaled.jpg 2560w, https:\/\/www.xtd-ss.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/cost-comparison-300x300.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.xtd-ss.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/cost-comparison-1024x1024.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/www.xtd-ss.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/cost-comparison-150x150.jpg 150w, https:\/\/www.xtd-ss.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/cost-comparison-768x768.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.xtd-ss.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/cost-comparison-1536x1536.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/www.xtd-ss.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/cost-comparison-2048x2048.jpg 2048w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 2560px) 100vw, 2560px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">316 stainless steel costs <strong>15\u201325% more than 304,<\/strong> depending on current nickel and molybdenum market prices.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The extra cost comes from:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Higher nickel content<\/strong>: 10\u201314% in 316 versus 8\u201310.5% in 304<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Molybdenum addition<\/strong>: 2\u20133% Mo is an expensive alloying element<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Lower production volume<\/strong>: 304 is produced in much larger quantities, giving it better economies of scale<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For a project using NPS 4, Schedule 40 seamless pipe in 50-metre lengths, switching from 304 to 316 might add to the material cost. On large-volume orders, this premium can represent a significant procurement cost.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Specifying 316 where 304 is sufficient adds unnecessary cost; conversely, using 304 in chloride-heavy environments risks premature failure.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Best Applications for 304 Stainless Steel Pipes<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"503\" src=\"https:\/\/www.xtd-ss.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/304LStainlessSteelSeamlessPipe-1024x503.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1230\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.xtd-ss.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/304LStainlessSteelSeamlessPipe-1024x503.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/www.xtd-ss.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/304LStainlessSteelSeamlessPipe-300x148.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.xtd-ss.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/304LStainlessSteelSeamlessPipe-768x378.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.xtd-ss.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/304LStainlessSteelSeamlessPipe.jpg 1200w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">304 is your best choice for these 5 applications:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ol class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Food and beverage processing<\/strong>: dairy, brewing, food-grade piping<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Architectural and decorative: handrails,<\/strong> cladding, building facades<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Water treatment<\/strong>: freshwater systems with low chloride content<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Kitchen and sanitary equipment<\/strong>: sinks, countertops, fittings<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>General industrial piping<\/strong>: where chloride exposure is minimal<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Best Applications for 316 Stainless Steel Pipes<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"600\" height=\"600\" src=\"https:\/\/www.xtd-ss.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Seamless-Stainless-Steel-TP316-Pipe-compressed.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1233\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.xtd-ss.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Seamless-Stainless-Steel-TP316-Pipe-compressed.jpg 600w, https:\/\/www.xtd-ss.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Seamless-Stainless-Steel-TP316-Pipe-compressed-300x300.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.xtd-ss.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Seamless-Stainless-Steel-TP316-Pipe-compressed-150x150.jpg 150w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">316 is the right choice for these 5 applications:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ol class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Chemical processing<\/strong>: reactors, storage tanks, transfer piping for acids and chlorides<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n<ol start=\"2\" class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Marine environments<\/strong>: coastal structures, boat fittings, desalination plants<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n<ol start=\"3\" class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Pharmaceutical and biotech<\/strong>: clean-in-place (CIP) systems, sterile piping<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n<ol start=\"4\" class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Oil and gas<\/strong>: production piping, surface and subsurface piping in non-sour, low-chloride upstream applications; consult NACE MR0175 for sour service.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n<ol start=\"5\" class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Pulp and paper<\/strong>: chloride-containing bleaching chemicals<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">We manufacture <a href=\"https:\/\/www.xtd-ss.com\/stainless-steel-316-seamless-pipe.html\">316 seamless pipes<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.xtd-ss.com\/stainless-steel-316l-seamless-pipe.html\">316L seamless pipes<\/a> under ASTM A312.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">304 vs 316: Quick Decision Guide<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Ask yourself these 3 questions:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ol class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Will the pipe contact chlorides or seawater?<\/strong> \u2192 Choose 316<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Is the environment indoor, dry, or freshwater only?<\/strong> \u2192 Choose 304<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Is the budget tight and corrosion risk low?<\/strong> \u2192 Choose 304<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">When in doubt, 316L is the safer bet. The extra cost is insurance against pitting and crevice attack.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Conclusion<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">304 and 316 stainless steel share the same basic structure and mechanical strength. The difference is molybdenum. That 2\u20133% Mo in 316 raises its PREN from ~18 to ~23, giving it real chloride resistance.Use 304 for general-purpose, non-chloride applications. Use 316 wherever chlorides, marine air, or acidic chemicals are present. We produce both grades as seamless pipes and tubes. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.xtd-ss.com\/contact-us.html\">Contact us<\/a> for availability and pricing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\">\n {\n  \"@context\": \"https:\/\/schema.org\",\n  \"@graph\": [\n  {\n  \"@type\": \"TechArticle\",\n  \"@id\": \"https:\/\/www.xtd-ss.com\/blog\/304-vs-316-stainless-steel\/#article\",\n  \"url\": \"https:\/\/www.xtd-ss.com\/blog\/304-vs-316-stainless-steel\/\",\n  \"headline\": \"304 vs 316 Stainless Steel: Which One Is Better?\",\n  \"description\": \"This comparison covers chemical composition, corrosion resistance, mechanical properties, cost and the best applications for 304 and 316 stainless steel.\",\n  \"image\": {\n  \"@id\": \"https:\/\/www.xtd-ss.com\/blog\/304-vs-316-stainless-steel\/#primaryimage\"\n  },\n  \"datePublished\": \"2026-04-14T09:00:00+08:00\",\n  \"dateModified\": \"2026-05-30T09:00:00+08:00\",\n  \"inLanguage\": \"en\",\n  \"articleSection\": \"Stainless Steel\",\n  \"isPartOf\": {\n  \"@id\": \"https:\/\/www.xtd-ss.com\/blog\/304-vs-316-stainless-steel\/#webpage\"\n  },\n  \"author\": {\n  \"@type\": \"Person\",\n  \"@id\": \"https:\/\/www.xtd-ss.com\/author\/huang-bin\/#person\",\n  \"url\": \"https:\/\/www.xtd-ss.com\/author\/huang-bin\/\",\n  \"name\": \"Huang Bin\",\n  \"jobTitle\": \"Manager \u2014 International Trade Department\",\n  \"knowsAbout\": [\n  \"304 (UNS S30400) and 316 (UNS S31600) stainless steel composition\",\n  \"Molybdenum's role in chloride corrosion resistance\",\n  \"ASTM A312 and A213 specifications\"\n  ],\n  \"worksFor\": {\n  \"@id\": \"https:\/\/www.xtd-ss.com\/#Organization\"\n  },\n  \"sameAs\": [\n  \"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/huang-bin-xtd\/\"\n  ]\n  },\n  \"publisher\": {\n  \"@id\": \"https:\/\/www.xtd-ss.com\/#Organization\"\n  },\n  \"about\": [\n  {\n  \"@type\": \"Thing\",\n  \"name\": \"304 stainless steel\",\n  \"description\": \"Austenitic stainless steel UNS S30400 \u2014 18% Cr \/ 8% Ni.\"\n  },\n  {\n  \"@type\": \"Thing\",\n  \"name\": \"316 stainless steel\",\n  \"description\": \"Molybdenum-bearing austenitic stainless steel UNS S31600 \u2014 16% Cr \/ 10% Ni \/ 2% Mo.\"\n  },\n  {\n  \"@type\": \"Thing\",\n  \"name\": \"Austenitic stainless steel\"\n  }\n  ],\n  \"mentions\": [\n  {\n  \"@type\": \"Product\",\n  \"name\": \"Stainless steel 304 seamless pipe\",\n  \"url\": \"https:\/\/www.xtd-ss.com\/stainless-steel-304-seamless-pipe.html\"\n  },\n  {\n  \"@type\": \"Product\",\n  \"name\": \"Stainless steel 316 seamless pipe\",\n  \"url\": \"https:\/\/www.xtd-ss.com\/stainless-steel-316-seamless-pipe.html\"\n  }\n  ],\n  \"citation\": [\n  {\n  \"@type\": \"CreativeWork\",\n  \"name\": \"ASTM A312\/A312M \u2014 Standard Specification for Seamless, Welded, and Heavily Cold Worked Austenitic Stainless Steel Pipes\",\n  \"url\": \"https:\/\/store.astm.org\/a0312_a0312m-24.html\",\n  \"publisher\": {\n  \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n  \"name\": \"ASTM International\"\n  }\n  },\n  {\n  \"@type\": \"CreativeWork\",\n  \"name\": \"ASTM A213\/A213M \u2014 Standard Specification for Seamless Ferritic and Austenitic Alloy-Steel Boiler, Superheater, and Heat-Exchanger Tubes\",\n  \"url\": \"https:\/\/store.astm.org\/a0213_a0213m-25.html\",\n  \"publisher\": {\n  \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n  \"name\": \"ASTM International\"\n  }\n  }\n  ]\n  },\n  {\n  \"@type\": \"WebPage\",\n  \"@id\": \"https:\/\/www.xtd-ss.com\/blog\/304-vs-316-stainless-steel\/#webpage\",\n  \"url\": \"https:\/\/www.xtd-ss.com\/blog\/304-vs-316-stainless-steel\/\",\n  \"isPartOf\": {\n  \"@id\": \"https:\/\/www.xtd-ss.com\/#WebSite\"\n  },\n  \"primaryImageOfPage\": {\n  \"@id\": \"https:\/\/www.xtd-ss.com\/blog\/304-vs-316-stainless-steel\/#primaryimage\"\n  },\n  \"breadcrumb\": {\n  \"@id\": \"https:\/\/www.xtd-ss.com\/blog\/304-vs-316-stainless-steel\/#breadcrumb\"\n  }\n  },\n  {\n  \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n  \"@id\": \"https:\/\/www.xtd-ss.com\/blog\/304-vs-316-stainless-steel\/#primaryimage\",\n  \"url\": \"https:\/\/www.xtd-ss.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/304-vs-316-stainless-steel.png\",\n  \"contentUrl\": \"https:\/\/www.xtd-ss.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/304-vs-316-stainless-steel.png\",\n  \"width\": 1290,\n  \"height\": 600,\n  \"caption\": \"304 vs 316 stainless steel \u2014 composition and corrosion comparison\"\n  },\n  {\n  \"@type\": \"BreadcrumbList\",\n  \"@id\": \"https:\/\/www.xtd-ss.com\/blog\/304-vs-316-stainless-steel\/#breadcrumb\",\n  \"itemListElement\": [\n  {\n  \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n  \"position\": 1,\n  \"name\": \"XTD\",\n  \"item\": \"https:\/\/www.xtd-ss.com\/\"\n  },\n  {\n  \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n  \"position\": 2,\n  \"name\": \"Blog\",\n  \"item\": \"https:\/\/www.xtd-ss.com\/blog\/\"\n  },\n  {\n  \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n  \"position\": 3,\n  \"name\": \"304 vs 316 Stainless Steel: Which One Is Better?\"\n  }\n  ]\n  }\n  ]\n }\n <\/script>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Both 304 and 316 are austenitic stainless steels that resist corrosion, handle high temperatures, and weld easily. One critical element that separates them is molybdenum. This element improves corrosion resistance and affects both performance and cost. This comparison covers chemical composition, corrosion resistance, mechanical properties, cost, and the best applications for 304 and 316 stainless [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":1227,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[17],"tags":[24,25,27,26],"class_list":["post-656","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-stainless-steel","tag-304-stainless-steel","tag-316-stainless-steel","tag-cost-comparison","tag-ss-304-vs-316"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.xtd-ss.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/656","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.xtd-ss.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.xtd-ss.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.xtd-ss.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.xtd-ss.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=656"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/www.xtd-ss.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/656\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1331,"href":"https:\/\/www.xtd-ss.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/656\/revisions\/1331"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.xtd-ss.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1227"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.xtd-ss.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=656"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.xtd-ss.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=656"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.xtd-ss.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=656"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}